{"id":494,"date":"2014-04-01T00:01:15","date_gmt":"2014-03-31T22:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/?p=494"},"modified":"2026-07-26T16:21:23","modified_gmt":"2026-07-26T14:21:23","slug":"the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/","title":{"rendered":"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Lok<\/a>
Lok Ta Dambong Dek, a.k.a. the Lord of the Iron Staff, before whom all Buddhist witnesses at the ECCC take an oath prior to testifying<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

On 4 March 2014 the ECCC Co-Prosecutors proposed amendments to ECCC Internal Rules 55 and 89ter<\/i> to enable crime sites and criminal incidents to be excluded from the scope of investigation or trial upon their proposal. The proposed amendments<\/a>, if recommended by the Rules and Procedure Committee and adopted by the Plenary, would introduce a procedure that is that is not founded in the Cambodian civil law system and which would not respect the principle of legalism that is unquestionably applicable before the courts of Cambodia, including the ECCC. \u00a0Bluntly, the Co-Prosecutors are urging the Rules and Procedure Committee and the Plenary to engage in \u201csituational ethics\u201d to disregard the applicable law and legal system because it does not accommodate them.\u00a0 The Co-Prosecutors are urging the Judges to act ultra vires<\/i>.\u00a0 Accordingly, I have submitted observations urging the Judges to reject the Co-Prosecutors\u2019 proposed amendments in their entirety<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Essentially, under the principle of legalism, also called prosecutorial legalism, the prosecutor must prosecute when it is clear that a crime has been committed. The prosecution has no discretion as to whether to investigate crimes known to have been committed or to drop charges once an indictment has been secured.\u00a0 Judges have no discretion to abandon charges: whatever is in the indictment must be tried.<\/p>\n

This is a significant attribute of the civil law system.\u00a0 This prevents frivolous charges being indicted (a usual practice in some common law systems; hence the expression that even a ham-sandwich can be indicted).\u00a0 It also protects against political interference by preventing the non-prosecution of charges once all procedural safeguards have been respected during the confirmation process of the charges.<\/p>\n

The principle of legalism constrains the trial judges: they cannot \u2013 for whatever reason \u2013 ignore, discharge, and discontinue charges in the indictment.\u00a0 The entire indictment must be tried leading to an acquittal or conviction on all or some of the charges depending on the evidence.\u00a0\u00a0 For the suspects and accused before the ECCC it is also about legal certainty.\u00a0 If the judicial system in Cambodia, of which the ECCC is a part, does not allow for confirmed charges to be summarily dismissed by judges, then any charges not tried remain active, albeit in abeyance.<\/p>\n

Were the principle of legalism to be abandoned by the ECCC, then what is to prevent the other Cambodian courts from following suit?\u00a0 Just imagine the ramifications: judges would \u2013 for all sorts of reasons, including nefarious ones \u2013 have the authority to abandon charges in the middle of the trial.\u00a0 Such practices could result in uncertainty in prosecutions, since in theory the discontinued \/ abandoned charges could be revived in future trials, and, of course, accused of means would be poised to influence the discontinuation of charges even when the evidence rightly points towards conviction.\u00a0 The Co-Prosecutors are unwittingly proposing license for mischief before the courts of Cambodia.<\/p>\n

The Co-Prosecutors are attempting to get around the principle of legalism in order to shorten the remainder of the trial in Case 002 and to limit the investigations in Cases 003 and 004.\u00a0 Ever since the severance in Case 002, the Co-Prosecutors have relentlessly tried to introduce Anglo-Saxon modalities as a means of dispensing with pesky legal principles that are part and parcel of the Cambodian legal system, which, unquestionably is modeled after the French civil law system.\u00a0 And how better for the Co-Prosecutors, especially the international ones, to achieve this goal than by invoking procedures adopted at other ad hoc<\/i> tribunals while exhorting \u2013 abusively, might I add \u2013 their usual mantra, that it is reflective of international standards<\/i>.\u00a0 A catchphrase bandied about by the Co-Prosecutors as legal authority to mean anything and everything, especially when asking the ECCC judges to thwart Cambodian \/ ECCC (civil law) procedures and adopt \/ cherry-pick procedures from other jurisdictions and legal traditions that are less inhibiting to the prosecution.<\/p>\n

But why the sudden urge for these rule changes?\u00a0 Have the Co-Prosecutors suffered a moment of clarity?<\/p>\n

The Co-Prosecutors were the ones who drafted the introductory submissions and selected the scope and contours of the investigations to be carried out by the Co-Investigating Judges.\u00a0 If the Co-Prosecutors were unable or unwilling to go forward with the results of the investigation, then why give such broad and over-reaching investigative instructions to the Co-Investigating Judges?\u00a0 Why mislead the Civil Parties?\u00a0 Why have the Co-Investigating Judges embark on a lengthy investigation of myriad incidents, consuming enormous amounts of time, effort and financial resources, only to claim as Smith does \u201cWe certainly want the investigation and trials to continue, but we want to make sure they don\u2019t go on endlessly because of the cost involved and the age of the accused.\u201d\u00a0 Cambodia Daily<\/i>, March 28, 2014<\/a>.\u00a0 Smith appears lost in his own spin: he says that he wants the investigations to go on, but not really, as the suspects will probably die and the ECCC needs an exit strategy without the prosecution losing face. Now that\u2019s jolly good reason to jettison the time honored principle of legalism applicable before the courts of Cambodia.<\/p>\n

When did Smith figure this out \u2013 after all, he, unlike his international bosses (Robert Petit, Andrew Cayley and Nicholas Koumjian), has been around as the Deputy Co-Prosecutor from the very beginning, was the driving force behind the investigations in Case 002, and is responsible for drawing up the contours of the investigations in Cases 003 and 004?\u00a0 When did it dawn on Smith and others that the suspects and accused were septuagenarians and octogenarians?<\/p>\n

The fact that the investigations and trial have dragged on \u2013 for reasons which were almost entirely avoidable, and indisputably foreseeable \u2013 is not a legal justification to introduce impermissible modalities into the Cambodian\/ECCC legal system.<\/p>\n

The Co-Prosecutors claim that these amendments are legitimate by looking at other tribunals such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).\u00a0\u00a0 But the ICTY does not follow the French civil law system; it is primarily an adversarial system that is sui generis<\/i>.\u00a0 The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 reliance on procedural rules at the ICTY and other tribunals is illogical.\u00a0 Procedural rules and jurisprudence from these tribunals cannot \u2013 by analogy or otherwise \u2013 be imported into the ECCC, because the ECCC operates in an entirely different legal system from these tribunals. \u00a0The fact that the ECCC is often referred to as an \u201cinternationalized\u201d court does not mean that it is bound by procedures followed by the ICTY or other international tribunals to the exclusion of Cambodian procedure, particularly where no lacunae<\/i> exist.<\/p>\n

The Establishment Law (which established the ECCC) is domestic Cambodian legislation. It confirms that the Extraordinary Chambers are established within the existing court structure. \u00a0As a domestic Cambodian court, the ECCC differs substantially from the ICTY and other international tribunals.\u00a0 The procedural rules at these other tribunals cannot be imposed upon the ECCC simply because the existing applicable procedural rules are inconvenient to the Co-Prosecutors.<\/p>\n

The Co-Prosecutors claim that withdrawing charges in whole or in part after an indictment has been issued can also be seen in national systems operating within civil law criminal codes.\u00a0 This claim is misleading. The Cambodian legal system is modeled on the French system, which, as the Supreme Court Chamber explained, follows the principle of legalism \/ mandatory prosecution, in which charges, crime sites, and criminal action cannot be withdrawn.\u00a0 The Co-Prosecutors claim that the practice of withdrawing charges is allowed in certain national jurisdictions that follow the civil law system, but they refer only<\/i> to German procedure.\u00a0 Other civil law systems that follow the principle of legalism \/ mandatory prosecution were not analyzed by the Co-Prosecutors.<\/p>\n

German procedure differs from Cambodian procedure in that investigations are conducted by the prosecutor. This is unlike the Cambodian and French system, in which an investigative judge conducts a judicial investigation objectively for all parties concerned.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the German Code of Criminal Procedure, which permits the prosecutor to withdraw certain charges or parts of an offense, is a piece of legislation that has been duly enacted by the legislature.\u00a0 It is not a judge-made rule created to accommodate the prosecution in a particular case.\u00a0 German legislation cannot therefore serve as a model for any proposed amendment to the Internal Rules.<\/p>\n

Amendments of this nature, which affect legal principles on which the Court is based, should be made to the Establishment Law by the Cambodian government and not by the Plenary.\u00a0 Internal Rules cannot be enacted which contradict Article 2 new of the Establishment Law (which states that the ECCC shall be established in the existing court structure) and Article 7 of the Cambodian Code of Criminal Procedure (which sets out when criminal action may be extinguished).<\/p>\n

The legal authority to adopt Internal Rules is given to the ECCC through the National Assembly by means of Article 33 new of the Establishment Law, but only to the extent that the existing procedures in force do not deal with a particular matter, or if there is uncertainty regarding their interpretation or application or if there is a question regarding their consistency with international standards<\/i>.\u00a0 Notwithstanding Article 33 new of the Establishment Law, the legal framework of the ECCC does not provide the Judges with legislative authority over procedural issues, where judge-adopted rules conflict with or deviate from procedural legislation adopted by the National Assembly.<\/p>\n

Judges are not legislators and the Plenary is no substitute for the National Assembly.\u00a0 Simply, the judicial authority at the ECCC \u2013 as elsewhere \u2013 cannot appropriate unto itself a power that is expressly conferred elsewhere.<\/p>\n

Finally, the Co-Prosecutors claim that the withdrawal of crime sites or criminal incidents that support the crimes charged does not affect the rights of Civil Parties.\u00a0 This is disingenuous.\u00a0 The fact is that any Civil Parties associated with any portions of the investigation or segments of the Closing Order which would not be pursued would face effective decertification, in that the events related to their Civil Party status will never be adjudicated.\u00a0 For the Co-Prosecutors to be suggesting that any Civil Party affected by eliminating portions of the investigation or Closing Order could nonetheless provide evidence or be heard is nonsensical; not only because witnesses or Civil Parties cannot be heard on events not before the Trial Chamber, but also because it would defeat the purpose of the proposed amendments, which is to expedite the proceedings.\u00a0 Effectively, the Co-Prosecutors are throwing the Civil Parties under the proverbial bus.<\/p>\n

Having made their own bed with an overbroad scope of investigation and total disregard of the wages of age and time, the Co-Prosecutors cannot cure their lack of foresight by upending an entire legal system.\u00a0 They must now lie in that bed, however fitful and long the night may seem.<\/p>\n

360 years ago Oliver Cromwell said:<\/p>\n

Feigned necessities, imagined necessities … are the greatest cozenage that men can put upon the Providence of God, and make pretenses to break known rules by.<\/em>[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

The Plenary must not be coopted into this prosecutorial cozenage.\u00a0 The rule of law, the separation of powers, and the integrity of the entire Cambodian judicial system rest in the balance.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n


<\/p>\n
\n
\n

[1]<\/a> Speech to the First Protectorate Parliament<\/i>, 12 September 1654.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On 4 March 2014 the ECCC Co-Prosecutors proposed amendments to ECCC Internal Rules 55 and 89ter to enable crime sites and criminal incidents to be excluded from the scope of investigation or trial upon their proposal. The proposed amendments, if recommended by the Rules and Procedure Committee and adopted by the Plenary, would introduce a … Continue reading “The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[22,21,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eccc","category-international-criminal-law","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On 4 March 2014 the ECCC Co-Prosecutors proposed amendments to ECCC Internal Rules 55 and 89ter to enable crime sites and criminal incidents to be excluded from the scope of investigation or trial upon their proposal. The proposed amendments, if recommended by the Rules and Procedure Committee and adopted by the Plenary, would introduce a … Continue reading "The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-03-31T22:01:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-26T14:21:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael G. Karnavas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/mgkarnavas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mgkarnavas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael G. Karnavas\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael G. Karnavas\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\"},\"headline\":\"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-03-31T22:01:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-26T14:21:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1872,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2014\\\/03\\\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"ECCC\",\"International Criminal Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond - michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2014\\\/03\\\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-03-31T22:01:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-26T14:21:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2014\\\/03\\\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2014\\\/03\\\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2014\\\/04\\\/01\\\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Michael G. Karnavas Blog\",\"description\":\"International Criminal Law Blog\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\",\"name\":\"Michael G. Karnavas\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\",\"width\":365,\"height\":365,\"caption\":\"Michael G. Karnavas\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\"},\"description\":\"Michael G. Karnavas is an American trained lawyer. He is licensed in Alaska and Massachusetts and is qualified to appear before the various International tribunals, including the International Criminal Court (ICC). Residing and practicing primarily in The Hague, he is recognized as an expert in international criminal defence, including pre-trial, trial, and appellate advocacy.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/michael-g-karnavas-97494a75\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/https:\\\/\\\/twitter.com\\\/mgkarnavas\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/michael-g-karnavas\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","og_description":"On 4 March 2014 the ECCC Co-Prosecutors proposed amendments to ECCC Internal Rules 55 and 89ter to enable crime sites and criminal incidents to be excluded from the scope of investigation or trial upon their proposal. The proposed amendments, if recommended by the Rules and Procedure Committee and adopted by the Plenary, would introduce a … Continue reading \"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond\"","og_url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/","og_site_name":"michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","article_published_time":"2014-03-31T22:01:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-26T14:21:23+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Michael G. Karnavas","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/mgkarnavas","twitter_site":"@mgkarnavas","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael G. Karnavas","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael G. Karnavas","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79"},"headline":"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond","datePublished":"2014-03-31T22:01:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-26T14:21:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/"},"wordCount":1872,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg","articleSection":["ECCC","International Criminal Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/","url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/","name":"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg","datePublished":"2014-03-31T22:01:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-26T14:21:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Lord-of-the-Iron-Staff-225x300.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2014\/04\/01\/the-co-prosecutors-attempt-to-eviscerate-the-principle-of-legalism-at-the-eccc-and-beyond\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Co-Prosecutors\u2019 attempt to eviscerate the principle of legalism at the ECCC \u2026 and beyond"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/","name":"Michael G. Karnavas Blog","description":"International Criminal Law Blog","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79","name":"Michael G. Karnavas","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1","width":365,"height":365,"caption":"Michael G. Karnavas"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1"},"description":"Michael G. Karnavas is an American trained lawyer. He is licensed in Alaska and Massachusetts and is qualified to appear before the various International tribunals, including the International Criminal Court (ICC). Residing and practicing primarily in The Hague, he is recognized as an expert in international criminal defence, including pre-trial, trial, and appellate advocacy.","sameAs":["http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/michael-g-karnavas-97494a75\/","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/mgkarnavas"],"url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/author\/michael-g-karnavas\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=494"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6347,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions\/6347"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}