{"id":2641,"date":"2017-11-15T04:29:29","date_gmt":"2017-11-15T03:29:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/?p=2641"},"modified":"2019-10-22T12:30:00","modified_gmt":"2019-10-22T10:30:00","slug":"burundi-icc-withdrawal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/","title":{"rendered":"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><div id=\"google_language_translator\" class=\"default-language-en\"><\/div><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><blockquote class=\"otw-sc-quote\"><p>A State shall not be discharged, by reason of its withdrawal, from the obligations arising from this Statute while it was a Party to the Statute, including any financial obligations which may have accrued. Its withdrawal shall not affect any cooperation with the Court in connection with criminal investigations and proceedings in relation to which the withdrawing State had a duty to cooperate and which were commenced prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective, nor shall it prejudice in any way the continued consideration of any matter which was already under consideration by the Court prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective.<\/p><br \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 270px;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Rome Statute, Article 127(2)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was coming for some time. On 27 October 2017, Burundi became the first State Party to <a href=\"https:\/\/treaties.un.org\/doc\/Publication\/CN\/2016\/CN.805.2016-Eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">withdraw<\/a> from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The reasons for Burundi\u2019s withdrawal are not important, though not a mystery. Motivated by a desire to shut down an investigation and to avoid the potential of having the powerful and elite charged and dragged to The Hague to be tried, Burundi bid farewell to ceding its jurisdiction to the ICC to investigate and prosecute crimes falling under the Rome Statute \u2013 whenever Burundi (as other States Parties) refused or was incapable of doing so.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Will there now be a cascade of withdrawals by other States? Or to paraphrase from Shakespeare\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.owleyes.org\/text\/richard-3\/read\/act-scene-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Richard The Third Act 1, scene 1, 1\u20134<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>Is n<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>ow the winter of discontent<br \/>\nof the African States that have expressed an intent to withdraw from the ICC<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>\u00a0 Made glorious summer by Burundi\u2019s withdrawal;<br \/>\nAnd all the clouds that low\u2019r\u2019d upon some of these African Heads of State<br \/>\nIn the deep bosom of the ocean buried?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Heads of States in illiberal and quasi-liberal democracies (I am referring to States where there is a semblance of the rule of law though squeezed by political interference and corruption) do not countenance foreign scrutiny and accountability of their domestic affairs, especially when they relate to investigations of alleged criminal activity subject to prosecution in a court beyond their ability to control the outcome.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Burundi may be the first to withdraw from the ICC, but it certainly will not be the last. Other States have given notice or have threatened to give notice to withdraw for effectively the same reasons given by Burundi. South Africa deposited a <a href=\"https:\/\/treaties.un.org\/doc\/Publication\/CN\/2016\/CN.786.2016-Eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">notice of<\/a> withdrawal in October 2016, though it <a href=\"https:\/\/treaties.un.org\/doc\/publication\/CN\/2017\/CN.121.2017-Eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rescinded its notice of withdrawal<\/a> in March 2017, after the Gauteng High Court found that the notice was unconstitutional and invalid because it was not subject to parliamentary approval. The Gambia put in a <a href=\"https:\/\/treaties.un.org\/doc\/Publication\/CN\/2016\/CN.862.2016-Eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">notice of withdrawal<\/a> in November 2016, only to <a href=\"https:\/\/treaties.un.org\/doc\/Publication\/CN\/2017\/CN.62.2017-Eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rescind the notice of withdrawal<\/a> in February 2017, following Gambia\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/world-africa-38183906\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">presidential 2016 election<\/a>, which ended the rule of former President Yahye Jammeh. Recall that it was <a href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2016\/10\/31\/gambia-icc-exodus\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">President Jammeh<\/a> who once characterized the ICC as \u201cthe International Caucasian Court for the persecution and humiliation of people of colour, especially Africans.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I suspect that there will also be other withdrawals for other reasons (hope for the ICC to get its act together and mature as an efficient, effective, and even-handed judicial institution does not spring eternal). The reasons for any future withdrawals are essentially unimportant. States Parties are entitled to withdraw for whatever reason fancies them. The Rome Statute being a treaty, it provides for withdrawal under Article 127(1) \u2013 a negotiated buyer\u2019s remorse clause with an unreserved right for any State Party to walk away and reclaim the jurisdiction it ceded to the ICC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the wake of Burundi\u2019s withdrawal and the buildup to the Pre-Trial Chamber\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/CourtRecords\/CR2017_06720.PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">public redacted version of its authorization<\/a> for the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) to conduct a formal investigation in Burundi (the public decision shed light on ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda\u2019s 15 September 2017<em> ex parte<\/em> request to investigate in Burundi), there had been lots of very thoughtful, if not erudite, posts on interpreting Article 127(2) when it comes to the ICC\u2019s jurisdiction over acts prior to a State\u2019s withdrawal from the Rome Statute (<em>see<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/dovjacobs.com\/2017\/10\/28\/burundi-withdraws-from-the-icc-what-next-for-a-possible-investigation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/33501\/burundi-leaves-icc-international-criminal-court-investigate-crimes-there\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2017\/11\/06\/piecing-the-withdrawal-puzzle-may-the-icc-still-open-an-investigation-in-burundi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2017\/11\/06\/piecing-the-withdrawal-puzzle-may-the-icc-still-open-an-investigation-in-burundi-part-1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2017\/10\/29\/does-the-icc-still-have-jurisdiction-over-crimes-in-burundi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Much of the debate has hinged on when a matter is \u201calready under consideration by the Court\u201d under Article 127(2). Some have argued that a matter is under consideration by the Court when the OTP begins its preliminary investigation (PE) (<em>see <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/46936\/iccs-burundi-investigation-court-headed\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2017\/10\/29\/does-the-icc-still-have-jurisdiction-over-crimes-in-burundi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>). Others disagree that a unilateral PE initiated by the OTP, with no framework to set the parameters for the investigation, can be considered \u201ca matter already under consideration by the Court\u201d so as to frustrate a State\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC. <a href=\"https:\/\/dovjacobs.com\/2017\/10\/28\/burundi-withdraws-from-the-icc-what-next-for-a-possible-investigation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dov Jacobs<\/a> pointed out that the informal phase of the investigation \u201cmight simply involve an OTP investigator sitting in front of his computer in The Hague downloading HRW and Amnesty International reports.\u201d Others have <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2017\/10\/29\/does-the-icc-still-have-jurisdiction-over-crimes-in-burundi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">commented<\/a> that it cannot be assumed that the OTP is considered \u201cthe Court,\u201d for the purposes of Article 127(2).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Burundi, this conversation matters not, because the Pre-Trial Chamber <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/CourtRecords\/CR2017_06720.PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">authorized<\/a> the OTP\u2019s formal investigation three days before Burundi\u2019s withdrawal became effective; the matter was \u201calready under consideration by the Court\u201d prior to its withdrawal. While the debate on the interpretation of Article 127(2) is interesting from an academic perspective, the more important conversation is <em>what now?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Time for a serious reality check<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Burundi has repeatedly expressed that it will not cooperate with the ICC. What does this mean in practical terms?\u00a0 Well, just go back to my previous <a href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/13\/icc-prosecutor-to-unsc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">post<\/a> on Fatou Bensouda\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/Pages\/item.aspx?name=otp_lib_unsc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">speech<\/a> to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The UNSC referred the situation in Libya to the ICC in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/NR\/rdonlyres\/081A9013-B03D-4859-9D61-5D0B0F2F5EFA\/0\/1970Eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Resolution 1970<\/a>. Presumably, the OTP should have no problem going <em>in situ<\/em> to investigate, collect physical evidence, interview witnesses, have its arrest warrants executed, have suspects and accused brought to The Hague, and so on \u2013 in short, have the full and unhindered cooperation of the host State. Though it should be so, it is not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The efforts of Madame Bensouda\u2019s office to conduct credible investigations and to have arrest warrants executed have been stymied by the Libyan authorities. The UNSC has proved to be brazenly ineffectual \u2013 just as it has been in the situation in Darfur (<em>see<\/em> my <a href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/07\/27\/taking-international-out-of-justice\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">post<\/a> on the Pre-Trial Chamber\u2019s decision declining to refer South Africa\u2019s non-compliance with its obligations on the Rome Statute to the Assembly of States Parties).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2645\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2645\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2645\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli.jpg?resize=300%2C169&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli.jpg?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli.jpg?w=1024&amp;ssl=1 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 85vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2645\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and Tanzanian President John Magufuli<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A case is only as good as the investigation and the collection of evidence. If Burundi follows through with its public statements that it will not cooperate with the ICC (and there is no reason to doubt it will flinch or do an about-face), you can expect a total blocking of any ICC investigation in Burundi. And there is nothing the ICC can do about it. Don\u2019t expect any cooperation from other African States Parties either. While warmly <a href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/13\/icc-prosecutor-to-unsc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">embracing<\/a> Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir, who is wanted by the ICC for genocide among other crimes alleged to have been committed in Darfur, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and Tanzanian President John Magufuli <a href=\"http:\/\/www.africanews.com\/2017\/11\/12\/uganda-s-museveni-tanzania-s-magufuli-condemn-icc-probe-in-burundi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">condemned<\/a> the Pre-Trial Chamber\u2019s decision to authorize a formal investigation. Indecently, both Uganda and Tanzania are <a href=\"https:\/\/asp.icc-cpi.int\/en_menus\/asp\/states%20parties\/pages\/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">States Parties<\/a> to the Rome Statute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>There\u2019s a dark cloud overhead<br \/>\nAs if brought by a storm<br \/>\nBut this cloud will not shift<br \/>\nAnd more clouds begin to form<\/em><\/strong>((<strong>\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>First stanza of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.poemhunter.com\/poem\/dark-clouds-8\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dark Clouds<\/a> by Allyson Gordon.))<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Politics and capitulating to political pressure abounds in international criminal law. It really does not matter who establishes the judicial institution that is expected to carry out the task of pursuing and prosecuting alleged perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes and humanity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Even the International Criminal Court for Rwanda (ICTR) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ga\/search\/view_doc.asp?symbol=S\/RES\/955(1994)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">established by the UNSC<\/a> \u2013 had to succumb to the pressures of the Rwandan government if it wished to have access to Rwanda, where the crimes were committed and where the evidence was located. ICTR Prosecutor Carla del Ponte, dubbed the \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2001\/mar\/04\/warcrimes.comment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">avenging angel<\/a>,\u201d had her wings clipped <a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalpolicy.org\/component\/content\/article\/163\/29047.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">when she dared investigate crimes committed by Tutsis<\/a>, and indeed, no charges were brought against Tutsis (<em>see <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2008\/12\/11\/ictr-address-crimes-committed-rpf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/justicehub.org\/article\/the-rwanda-tribunal-closes-but-controversy-is-brewing-over-its-archives\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>). When <a href=\"http:\/\/legal.un.org\/avl\/pdf\/ls\/Goldstone_bio.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Richard Goldstone<\/a> was ICTR Prosecutor, the Court acquiesced to having <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Froduald_Karamira\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Froduald Karamira<\/a> \u2013 Vice President of the MDR Hutu Party and founder of Hutu Power, an extremist group credited with authorizing the genocide in Rwanda \u2013 be tried (and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnesty.org\/en\/documents\/afr47\/011\/1998\/en\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">executed<\/a>) by the national courts of Rwanda, rather than having him tried at the ICTR. The UN, being aware of the deficiencies in the Rwandan judiciary and knowing that Karamira would be subject to the death penalty, should never have turned him over to the national courts. Nonetheless, Rwanda made clear that unless the ICTR turned him over, it would not cooperate, potentially going so far as to shut down the OTP office in Kigali (<em>see<\/em> my 1997 <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20100309095104\/http:\/\/www.nacdl.org\/CHAMPION\/ARTICLES\/97may01.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">article<\/a> in <em>The Champion<\/em> discussing the difficulties stemming from the lack of cooperation between the ICTR and the Rwandan government).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This all goes to show that the prosecution of cases (part and parcel of which is the investigation, execution of arrest warrants, and transfer of accused) cannot be done without the full cooperation of the host State. Granted, I am looking at things from a practitioner\u2019s point of view. It may not sit well with those who have placed their hope on the ICC to hold accountable and bring to justice those who fall under the ICC\u2019s jurisdiction. But to ignore reality is to ignore the ever-increasing realization that the ICC has vast limitations that extend beyond its ability to control.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As one of my colleagues put it recently: \u201c<em>International justice has nothing to do with justice, international or of any other kind. It is all politics. Even if the OTP independently investigates situations, it cannot go forward with the support (politics) of the UNSC.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/comments2.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-919\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/comments2.png?resize=274%2C184&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"274\" height=\"184\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It was coming for some time. On 27 October 2017, Burundi became the first State Party to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The reasons for Burundi\u2019s withdrawal are not important, though not a mystery. Motivated by a desire to shut down an investigation and to avoid the potential of having the powerful and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,21],"tags":[4,7],"class_list":["post-2641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-icc","category-international-criminal-law","tag-icc","tag-international-criminal-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It was coming for some time. On 27 October 2017, Burundi became the first State Party to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The reasons for Burundi\u2019s withdrawal are not important, though not a mystery. Motivated by a desire to shut down an investigation and to avoid the potential of having the powerful and &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-15T03:29:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-22T10:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael G. Karnavas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/mgkarnavas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mgkarnavas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael G. Karnavas\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael G. Karnavas\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\"},\"headline\":\"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-15T03:29:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-22T10:30:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1654,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"ICC\",\"International Criminal Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"ICC\",\"International Criminal Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/\",\"name\":\"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality - michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-15T03:29:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-22T10:30:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Michael G. Karnavas Blog\",\"description\":\"International Criminal Law Blog\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79\",\"name\":\"Michael G. Karnavas\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\",\"width\":365,\"height\":365,\"caption\":\"Michael G. Karnavas\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1\"},\"description\":\"Michael G. Karnavas is an American trained lawyer. He is licensed in Alaska and Massachusetts and is qualified to appear before the various International tribunals, including the International Criminal Court (ICC). Residing and practicing primarily in The Hague, he is recognized as an expert in international criminal defence, including pre-trial, trial, and appellate advocacy.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/michael-g-karnavas-97494a75\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/https:\\\/\\\/twitter.com\\\/mgkarnavas\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/michaelgkarnavas.net\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/michael-g-karnavas\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","og_description":"It was coming for some time. On 27 October 2017, Burundi became the first State Party to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The reasons for Burundi\u2019s withdrawal are not important, though not a mystery. Motivated by a desire to shut down an investigation and to avoid the potential of having the powerful and &hellip; Continue reading \"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality\"","og_url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/","og_site_name":"michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","article_published_time":"2017-11-15T03:29:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-22T10:30:00+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Michael G. Karnavas","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/mgkarnavas","twitter_site":"@mgkarnavas","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael G. Karnavas","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael G. Karnavas","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79"},"headline":"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality","datePublished":"2017-11-15T03:29:29+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-22T10:30:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/"},"wordCount":1654,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg","keywords":["ICC","International Criminal Law"],"articleSection":["ICC","International Criminal Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/","url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/","name":"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg","datePublished":"2017-11-15T03:29:29+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-22T10:30:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/MuseveniMagufuli-300x169.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2017\/11\/15\/burundi-icc-withdrawal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Burundi\u2019s withdrawal from the ICC nixes ongoing OTP investigations: coming to grips with reality"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/","name":"Michael G. Karnavas Blog","description":"International Criminal Law Blog","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d03dcdb5c7e0e85117fb75cfb7b98c79","name":"Michael G. Karnavas","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1","width":365,"height":365,"caption":"Michael G. Karnavas"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MGKarnavasCt.jpg?fit=365%2C365&ssl=1"},"description":"Michael G. Karnavas is an American trained lawyer. He is licensed in Alaska and Massachusetts and is qualified to appear before the various International tribunals, including the International Criminal Court (ICC). Residing and practicing primarily in The Hague, he is recognized as an expert in international criminal defence, including pre-trial, trial, and appellate advocacy.","sameAs":["http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/michael-g-karnavas-97494a75\/","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/mgkarnavas"],"url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/author\/michael-g-karnavas\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2641"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2641\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3691,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2641\/revisions\/3691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}