{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog","title":"Making Sense of the Standard & Burden of Proof in Hybrid Courts: Reflections on the Common Law & Civil Law Approaches to Proof - michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SPlk8vLuX8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2016\/04\/27\/making-sense-burden-of-proof\/\">Making Sense of the Standard &#038; Burden of Proof in Hybrid Courts: Reflections on the Common Law &#038; Civil Law Approaches to Proof<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/2016\/04\/27\/making-sense-burden-of-proof\/embed\/#?secret=SPlk8vLuX8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Making Sense of the Standard &#038; Burden of Proof in Hybrid Courts: Reflections on the Common Law &#038; Civil Law Approaches to Proof&#8221; &#8212; michaelgkarnavas.net\/Blog\" data-secret=\"SPlk8vLuX8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Hybrid: Anything derived from heterogeneous sources, or composed of elements of different incongruous kinds.\u00a0 (The Oxford English Dictionary, Second edition, Vol. VII, Oxford University Press 1989) Since Nuremberg, every international or internationalized criminal tribunal (ICTY, ICTR, SCSL, ECCC, ICC, STL) has adopted hybrid proceedings: mixing, matching, and manipulating procedural modalities from common law and civil &hellip; Continue reading \"\"","thumbnail_url":"http:\/\/michaelgkarnavas.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/patchwork-300x300.jpg"}